Læsehastighedstest
Vores mest populære værktøj til måling af læsehastighed
Få komplette læsbarhedsscores med flere formler. Identificér komplekse ord og lange sætninger, og få forslag til klarere tekst.
Indsæt eller skriv din tekst nedenfor for at beregne dens læsbarhedsscores
Privatliv: Din tekst behandles udelukkende i din browser og gemmes ikke på nogen server.
Readability scores help you gauge how easy or difficult it is for people to understand your text.
Our readability checker uses multiple industry-standard formulas to give you a comprehensive assessment of your text's clarity.
Scores from 0-100, with higher scores indicating easier readability.
Several formulas provide scores that correspond to U.S. grade levels:
A score of 8.0 means an 8th grade student can understand the text.
Long sentences require more cognitive effort to process. Breaking them up can significantly improve readability.
Words with three or more syllables are considered complex. Using simpler alternatives can make your text more accessible.
Passive constructions can make text harder to understand. Active voice is typically clearer and more direct.
Use shorter sentences (aim for 15-20 words per sentence)
Choose simpler words when possible
Break up long paragraphs
Use active voice instead of passive voice
Include transition words to guide readers
Add headings and subheadings to organize content
Use bullet points and numbered lists for complex information
Read your text aloud to identify awkward phrasing
Readability is just one aspect of good writing. Consider your audience, purpose, and content when evaluating text.
Clear, concise copy pays off twice: readers stay longer because they grasp your message faster, and search engines reward that positive behaviour.
High bounce rates (55%+) signal that visitors are abandoning pages before engaging, hurting both conversions and rankings.
Although one study found no direct ranking factor, pages in Google's top 30 average an 11th-grade level—meaning clarity influences success through user satisfaction signals even if not in the core algorithm.
Government agencies must also comply with the Plain Writing Act of 2010, which legally requires 'clear communication the public can understand and use.' PlainLanguage.gov echoes this, stressing that dense, cluttered copy drives readers to the 'read-later' pile and reduces task completion.
Half of U.S. adults struggle with books written above an 8th-grade level, and the national average hovers around grade 7–8.
Health authorities go further: patient-facing material should not exceed a 5th-grade level to maximise comprehension and adherence.
Every algorithm weighs text features differently. Character-based indexes like Coleman-Liau are quick for large data sets, while syllable-based metrics excel at nuance. For niche contexts, our checker also includes:
Tip: Run several formulas and optimise for the average to avoid over-tuning for one metric.
Unlike legacy tools that recalculate after each click, modern editors such as our tool show score changes instantly as you type, keeping writers in flow and reducing friction.
Our checker mirrors that experience and colours hard-to-read sentences (yellow = +4 grades, red = +6 grades above target) so you can fix the worst offenders first.
Drop in DOCX, PDF, Markdown—or crawl an entire domain. A REST-style API lets dev teams score content in CI/CD pipelines or pull metrics into CMS dashboards.
Supported outputs: Word, Markdown, CSV, clipboard, and JSON via API.
// Sample API request to check readability
fetch('https://api.speedreadr.io/v1/analyze', {
method: 'POST',
headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
body: JSON.stringify({
text: 'Your content to analyze',
target_grade: 8,
formulas: ['flesch', 'fog', 'smog']
})
})
.then(response => response.json())
.then(data => console.log(data));
Discover how different professionals leverage readability insights
Paste or upload your draft.
Watch live scores & colour highlights refresh in real time.
Fix red/yellow lines first; shorten sentences or swap complex words.
Iterate until you hit your target grade band.
Export the finished text or push it via API.
Integrate our grammar engine, cliché detector and tone analyser to ensure voice consistency across teams. Style-guide enforcement flags passive voice, jargon and overused phrases—all in the same dashboard.
Text is encrypted in transit and at rest; optional anonymisation strips identifiers, aligning with GDPR requirements for data privacy.
Enterprise clients can request on-prem API deployment for additional control.
0–100 scale where higher = easier.
≥ 3 syllables (Fog) or not in a 3,000-word list (Dale-Chall).
Avg. sentence length + % words > 6 letters.
Sentence where object receives the action.
% of visitors leaving after a single page view.
Learn about the different formulas used to assess readability and how to interpret their scores.
The Flesch Reading Ease score is one of the most widely used readability formulas. Higher scores indicate material that is easier to read, while lower scores indicate more difficult text. The formula considers sentence length and syllable count.
Higher scores indicate easier readability.
The Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level formula translates the Reading Ease score to a U.S. grade-school level. It tells you the academic grade a person needs to have completed to understand your content. The formula uses the same metrics (sentence length and syllables) but produces a grade-level score.
Lower scores indicate easier readability.
The Gunning Fog Index estimates the years of formal education a person needs to understand the text on first reading. It considers sentence length and the percentage of complex words (words with three or more syllables).
Lower scores indicate easier readability.
The Coleman-Liau Index relies on characters instead of syllables, making it ideal for computerized assessment. It estimates the U.S. grade level required to comprehend the text. Unlike other formulas, it focuses on character count, which is easier to calculate automatically.
Lower scores indicate easier readability.
The SMOG (Simple Measure of Gobbledygook) Index estimates the years of education needed to understand a piece of writing. It's particularly accurate for checking health messages and is often used in healthcare materials. SMOG focuses on polysyllabic words and is calculated using a sample of 30 sentences.
Lower scores indicate easier readability.
The Automated Readability Index (ARI) focuses on the character count per word rather than syllables, similar to the Coleman-Liau Index. This makes it easier to calculate programmatically. It yields an approximate representation of the US grade level needed to comprehend the text.
Lower scores indicate easier readability.
The Linsear Write Formula was developed for the U.S. Air Force to calculate the readability of technical manuals. It counts "easy words" (two syllables or less) and "hard words" (three syllables or more) in a 100-word sample, then applies a formula to calculate the grade level.
Lower scores indicate easier readability.
The FORCAST formula was developed specifically for assessing technical documents and forms, rather than running text with complete sentences. It only uses a count of one-syllable words in a 150-word sample to determine the grade level. "N" is the number of single-syllable words in the sample.
Lower scores indicate easier readability.
The Powers-Sumner-Kearl Formula was designed to assess the readability of elementary-level texts and children's books. It's typically used for content aimed at grades 1-6 and becomes less accurate for higher grade levels.
Lower scores indicate easier readability.
Each readability formula measures different aspects of text complexity. Some focus on sentence length, others on word length or syllable count. For the most accurate assessment, consider the average of multiple formulas and match the formula to your specific audience and content type.